A Voice for the Voiceless?

Few crimes are more wicked than those committed against we who have  disabilities. Fear of abandonment and reprisal makes us less likely than others to report being abused or mistreated. Crimes against us wound our sense of trust particularly deeply, especially if perpetrators are people on whom we have relied not just for help with everyday needs. It takes a tremendous effort and genuine courage for a person whose disability affects their communication skills to speak out about what has been done to them.

It is, sadly, not surprising in the least to hear recent allegations that a large number of rape and sexual assault crimes against people with disability have not been investigated in the State of South Australia. In a recent trial in that State, some charges had to be dropped because the alleged victims were unable to give evidence. Fresh charges of sexual crimes against other victims have since been laid.

One person championing these people’s cause is Kelly Vincent, an MP for the Dignity for Disability party. But Ms Vincent also supported legislation to introduce euthanasia in South Australia, and this is still passing through the Legislature there.

The question must be asked: how would the introduction of euthanasia to South Australia or anywhere else impact on those who are already legally voiceless to a large degree, as this case demonstrates? Those already ignored or frustrated by the Court System because of their disabilities would surely not be properly heard when end of life decisions are being made.

In countries where euthanasia is already legal, an alarming proportion of deaths occur without victims’ consent. How likely is it that consent will not be sought from someone assumed unable to communicate it?

The availability of euthanasia would betray disabled victims of violence, sexual assault or rape. Crimes that strip away victims’ confidence, trust, and sense of self esteem make people even more susceptible to the pro-euthanasia message that some lives are not worth living.

So if Kelly Vincent and Dignity for Disability are serious about giving people with disabilities a voice in the legal system – a voice to which we all have a genuine right – then they must stop advocating euthanasia, that would lead to more people with communication difficulties becoming victims.


About Daniel

I am a man with a disability living in Canberra, Australia. I'm passionate about the lives of people with disabilities - our joys, achievements, sorrows and setbacks. I want to encourage the people who support and love us, and stand firmly against obstacles placed in our way that may even threaten our very existence.
This entry was posted in In the News and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to A Voice for the Voiceless?

  1. Joan Apthorp says:

    Oh, please! Dignity for disabled people is not compatible with killing them. No group purporting to support disabled people should be advocating letting them be killed, whether by action or omission.

  2. F hyle says:

    My name is Fresh H Fessuh, US Citizen and Federal employee about 15 years. No vision in left eye and no right hand. This lady married me over seas while she was married for better life to come USA. She betrayed me, abused me both physically, mentally,verbally and assaulted me sexually for so long. She manipulated and lied the authority and system. No body would believe me or understand me because of my disabilities and they looked at me commented. I’m/could be dangerous. Then due abuse when I ended up in Hospital, she claimed false allegation against me and since then I have no voice,no justice and I am living with all pain,fear,struggle,anger, ups and down in my life. Disabilities was not my choice but it worked against me. I see is you disabled, victimized, you still victim…Only my paper understand-nobody.

    • Daniel says:

      Thank you for your comment, and apologies for this ‘blog having lain dormant for so long! Euthanasia laws pose a huge risk to people such as this gentleman who put their trust and place responsibility for their care onto people who are abusive. This is a particular risk to elderly people.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s